As a class we have come
a long way since the first day when the majority, if not everyone, did not even
know what an RFP was. Now we have created our own and sent it to twenty-five
different organizations with the hope that they will apply for our grant. The
process of writing our RFP was spread across several days of class. During that
time, we learned the differing views students hold on what is most important,
and the difficulties involved in selecting just the right word to describe our
meaning. When we first compiled a list of all the things students thought were
important, we realized that the proposals we would receive would be at least
twenty pages each to fit everything in. The process continued with class
discussion on how to narrow down our requests, so that we get everything we
need to make knowledgeable cuts to our list of organizations, without wasting
the organizations time with unnecessary questions.
The most contentious problem among the class was
deciding whether or not to accept requests for general operating costs. At our
first site visit, at Bethany Hill Place, we learned that the donations would go
to general operating costs, particularly staff salaries. This idea did not sit
well with many in our class. A debate on general operating costs lasted several
days. On one side students believed that the grant money should go to the
programs that are assisting those in need, not to things like staff salaries or
building payments. Others countered with the argument that without staff or a
place to work from then there would be no programs to help those in need. In
the end the class decided to accept requests for general operating costs as
long as details for the exact use of the funds are included.
General operating costs are a clear point of
difficulty in the world of charitable giving. Grant money going towards an
electric bill is not as ‘sexy’, as our professor says. The directness of money
going to a program to help the needy makes us feel good about what we have
done. It is easy to say that you have made an impact. When we are told that the
money is going towards salaries the immediate gut reaction is probably
somewhere along the line of thinking “I wanted to help the needy, not pay
someone”. But in actually it is more complicated than that. With a longer look
it is possible to see that the money isn’t just going towards salaries, the
money is making it possible for individuals to create programs for the needy,
to help directly, and to raise more money for those in need. If an organization
is not able to pay its own bills, then it will have to close its doors and no
one is going to receive help from a closed down organization.
Great post! After reading this post and reflecting on our class discussions about whether or not to accept requests for general operations, I have come to realize that through our group discussion, we have not only learned and practiced compromising through negotiation, but we've also been able to think beyond our initial view point in a way that has allowed us to broaden our knowledge. Realizing that there are more things that go into helping those in need, such as rental and salary expenses, enabled us to put into practice our sociological imagination. I am coming to notice the multiple way and connections in which this course continues to benefit us.
ReplyDelete